Therapeutic proteins manufactured in cellular systems contain residual DNA derived from host cell substrates used in production. Risk assessment of the residual host cell DNA is necessary, as some of these DNA sequences may be potentially infectious or oncogenic. Oncogenic potential lies in transmission of the activated oncogenes to subjects receiving the product, thereby inducing oncogenic events. Therefore, it becomes essential for drug manufacturers to show clearance of genomic DNA (oncogenic sequences as well) throughout production processes and to confirm low levels of residual DNA in the final drug substance. This study attempted to estimate the oncogenes in the total residual DNA using a highly sensitive, specific, and robust method—quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Routinely, total residual DNA is estimated using either the 18S ribosomal (r)DNA gene or Alu equivalent multicopy gene sequence as qPCR targets. We have determined the copy numbers of these qPCR targets along with the oncogene (Ras gene) and housekeeping genes (ACTB and GAPDH) and established a ratio of their presence in protein samples. Another objective of the study was to estimate the level of oncogenes from several in-process step samples in the manufacturing and purification process and check the clearance of total residual DNA including oncogenes. Upon quantification, the proportions of oncogenes present were one tenth of the quantified residual DNA levels (Ras gene:18S RNA) in the purification stage samples, providing information that the therapeutic protein product was safe from the presence of oncogenes in residual DNA by a factor of ten…
Tag: <span>biologics</span>
Biobanking is a critical component to realizing the promises of translational research and personalized medicine. The proper collection, processing, storage, and tracking of human biological samples allows researchers to better link molecular and clinical information, which in theory, allows for the development of more targeted therapies for patients. Realizing the scientific potential of well-annotated, properly preserved sample collections has led to the proliferation of large-scale biobanks by biopharmaceutical companies, academic organizations, governments, and non-profit research organizations. To this point, conservative industry projections estimate that in the United States, there are at least 300 million tissue samples in biobanks with an estimated accrual rate of 20 million samples annually…
Tangential flow filtration (TFF) microfiltration has been used as one of the choices for clarification of mammalian cell or microbial cell culture in the biopharmaceutical industry. Unlike the ultrafiltration process for protein concentration and the diafiltration application where the feed solution is relatively clean (free of colloids or larger particles after the clarification/purification process), the microfiltration process needs to handle a rather high-fouling feed stream such as cells, cell debris, colloids, etc. In a previously published article, we discussed that a TFF microfiltration step is limited by a maximum throughput or capacity obtainable under a given set of operating conditions. Some distinct microfiltration characteristics, such as critical permeate flux, permeate flux control, and maximum throughput were explained in that article…
The production of biopharmaceutical drugs typically involves a biological expression within a bacterial, yeast, or mammalian cell expansion system. Getting to the final product requires multiple purification steps, from primary clarification to the final formulation and sterile filtration. The aim of the initial purification steps is not to purify the stream perfectly but rather, to prepare the stream for finer and more specific purification steps further downstream. Apart from efficiently removing contaminants, the clarification stages also need to maintain high product recovery whilst being consistent and robust.
Cellular therapy is currently generating great interest in the treatment of a variety of diseases. In turn, this interest has stimulated the Center of Biologics Evaluation and Research of the Food and Drug Administration to examine its regulatory approach to the products used for these therapies. As a result, facilities preparing cell therapy products are now regarded as manufacturers, and are expected to comply with current Good Manufacturing Practices and/or the proposed current Good Tissue Practices. Compliance with these practices can be a culture shock to some academic centers whose background is firmly in research. The FDA has indicated that there is a sliding scale of compliance depending on the phase of the clinical study. The difficulty for centers is deciding where they fall on the compliance scale, as well as determining what changes must be made to come into compliance. This article reviews some of the factors that must be considered when making these decisions…
