The safety of biological products (biologics) derived from in vitro cultured cell lines of animal origin is dependent both on clinical studies to evaluate efficacy, and a matrix of controls throughout the manufacturing process to assure consistency, quality, and safety of the marketed product for human use. One major area of concern is virus safety. Through the combination of: (A) careful selection of raw materials; (B) testing of process intermediates; and (C) virus clearance evaluations of the individual steps in the manufacturing process; biologics manufacturers can demonstrate that their products are free from detectable adventitious and endogenous viruses. Comprehensive regulatory guidance suggests approaches for virus testing of biologics at early and later stages of clinical development and, although some countries have specific requirements, many of these approaches are harmonized worldwide. In general, regulatory authorities expect purification processes to include multiple steps with complementary, or orthogonal, methods for virus reduction including inactivation and separation or removal. Each step in the process may be more or less effective for reducing levels of different test viruses, and therefore selection of the appropriate panel of test viruses for the specific product is critical for viral clearance studies…
Tag: <span>biopharmaceuticals</span>
In today’s volatile sera market, it is critical that sera users worldwide thoroughly review their supply relationships and update sourcing and risk mitigation strategies. BioProcessing Journal’s recent article by Siegel and Foster highlighted the impact of selecting the appropriate country of origin as one criterion for purchasing decisions. Many more vital selection criteria exist to ensure a sera supplier provides long-term assurance of supply and integrity of supply. This article identifies critical questions sera users should ask their suppliers and explains why they should ask them…
Therapeutic proteins manufactured in cellular systems contain residual DNA derived from host cell substrates used in production. Risk assessment of the residual host cell DNA is necessary, as some of these DNA sequences may be potentially infectious or oncogenic. Oncogenic potential lies in transmission of the activated oncogenes to subjects receiving the product, thereby inducing oncogenic events. Therefore, it becomes essential for drug manufacturers to show clearance of genomic DNA (oncogenic sequences as well) throughout production processes and to confirm low levels of residual DNA in the final drug substance. This study attempted to estimate the oncogenes in the total residual DNA using a highly sensitive, specific, and robust method—quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Routinely, total residual DNA is estimated using either the 18S ribosomal (r)DNA gene or Alu equivalent multicopy gene sequence as qPCR targets. We have determined the copy numbers of these qPCR targets along with the oncogene (Ras gene) and housekeeping genes (ACTB and GAPDH) and established a ratio of their presence in protein samples. Another objective of the study was to estimate the level of oncogenes from several in-process step samples in the manufacturing and purification process and check the clearance of total residual DNA including oncogenes. Upon quantification, the proportions of oncogenes present were one tenth of the quantified residual DNA levels (Ras gene:18S RNA) in the purification stage samples, providing information that the therapeutic protein product was safe from the presence of oncogenes in residual DNA by a factor of ten…
Biobanking is a critical component to realizing the promises of translational research and personalized medicine. The proper collection, processing, storage, and tracking of human biological samples allows researchers to better link molecular and clinical information, which in theory, allows for the development of more targeted therapies for patients. Realizing the scientific potential of well-annotated, properly preserved sample collections has led to the proliferation of large-scale biobanks by biopharmaceutical companies, academic organizations, governments, and non-profit research organizations. To this point, conservative industry projections estimate that in the United States, there are at least 300 million tissue samples in biobanks with an estimated accrual rate of 20 million samples annually…
Batch processing has long been the predominant bioprocessing paradigm, both up- and downstream. Bioprocessing fluids are processed incrementally, piped as a bolus or transferred via vessels from one process and piece of equipment to the next. This continues to work well, including a number of technological advances resulting in improvements that continue to make bioprocessing more efficient. Upstream and overall process yields are essentially doubling about every five years, with this largely driven by improved cell lines, expression systems and genetic engineering, culture media, and equipment. Among the technologies now gaining increasing adoption and market share for biopharmaceutical manufacture is continuous (bio) processing, with perfusion currently the leading technology, in terms of adoption. The use of incremental, one-step-at-a-time, classic batch processing in biopharmaceutical manufacture is different than most other major products manufacturing and high-tech industries, where processing is generally more continuous. In this context, the move toward more continuous processing in manufacturing is a common characteristic of industries starting to reach maturity. Continuous processing is exemplified by assembly lines, and petroleum refining with processing involving a rather continuous flow of the material being manufactured from one unit operation to the next. Continuous processing generally follows and eventually replaces incremental manufacturing…
As a contract manufacturing organization (CMO) in this environment, it is essential for hameln pharma to deliver goods to their customers reliably, in terms of quantity, delivery time, and quality. Therefore, the topic of quality assurance plays a huge role— for both final packaged units as well as for bulk products. After a long-term analysis of the bulk product weighing process, hameln pharma’s objective was to significantly streamline the time-consuming process of manual counting and visual inspection. Moreover, taking cGMP standards into account, they wanted to optimize their existing process in order to remove any possibility of incomplete package volumes. Katrin Strasser, hameln pharma’s operational excellence expert, explained that: (1) packing box weights fluctuated with humidity levels during their manufacture; (2) labels for product packages varied; and (3) the actual number of items in a box carton were not always consistent
This paper examines FMEA as a QbD tool. If FMEA’s strengths are used and weaknesses understood, it can be effectively used within a QbD feedback algorithm to identify, analyze, prioritize, and remediate biopharmaceutical development and manufacturing risks…
This article documents the progress, current state, and projected future trends in titer and yield as industrial and technological benchmarks for commercial-scale biopharmaceutical manufacture. Biopharmaceutical product commercial-scale manufacturing (bioprocessing) was benchmarked by tracking titers and yields over time, from the 1980s to the present, and further out ten years. This study compiled commercial-scale titer and yield data for a set of 39 major biopharmaceuticals, nearly all mammalian-expressed proteins, particularly, monoclonal antibody products. This included extensive searches of many potential data sources, including contacting knowledgeable bioprocessing professionals. In the 1980s and early 1990s, average titers at commercial scale started out at < 0.5 g/L. The current average reported commercial-scale titer is 2.56 g/L. We also confirmed that the manufacture of commercial products has, over the years, undergone repeated cycles of technical production upgrades, with titers and yields increasing incrementally, even for the oldest products. BioPlan estimates that ?3 g/L is now the industry standard titer for new bioprocesses being developed, with ?7 g/L now presumed to be the general industry top-end titer level that, while not unusual, is not often achieved. In terms of yields, we found a 70% yield to be the current industry average yield, not the often-cited 75%. Improvements in downstream purification technologies (e.g., as demonstrated by higher yields) have been fewer and adopted more slowly than upstream production.
The production of biopharmaceutical drugs typically involves a biological expression within a bacterial, yeast, or mammalian cell expansion system. Getting to the final product requires multiple purification steps, from primary clarification to the final formulation and sterile filtration. The aim of the initial purification steps is not to purify the stream perfectly but rather, to prepare the stream for finer and more specific purification steps further downstream. Apart from efficiently removing contaminants, the clarification stages also need to maintain high product recovery whilst being consistent and robust.