The United States Pharmacopeia (USP) is a not-for-profit nongovernmental organization founded in 1820 that develops public standards for drug substances and products; these standards are enforceable by FDA and have been adopted by many nations around the world. USP General Chapters provide industrial and academic researchers alike with crucial guidance, particularly in areas where there is a regulatory void. A good recent example is the proposed USP general information chapter…
Category: <span>Regulatory</span>
New regulatory initiatives often produce paranoid responses. These over-reactions are often a result of initial rumors fueled by less-than scrupulous consultants or by misinterpreted statements reported out of context from unscripted regulators. The “remote monitoring capability” incorporated into the emerging Process Analytical Technology (www.fda.gov/cder/OPS/PAT.htm) initiative is a prime example. Put the fear back in the closet: remote monitoring will not lead to unannounced or secret FDA electronic visits, unscheduled remote audits, or regulatory spying on industry processing activities…
Although biological products are being licensed at a fairly steady pace, the cost to develop each product can be incredibly high, and far too many products with very little chance of success are entering clinical trials. The cost of developing a biological product is now estimated to be as high as $1.7 billion. This is truly a staggering figure that would seem to prevent all but the strongest company from attempting such a gamble. However, this number includes the cost of all the products that didn’t make it through pre-clinical development, or which entered clinical trials and failed for any number of reasons…
The United States Pharmacopeia (USP) is a 184-year-old organization that has been in the forefront of technology since its inception. From publishing a manual about how to prepare therapeutic potions, USP has evolved into a compendium of standards and information on manufactured pharmaceutical products, with more than 4,000 monographs covering drug substances and biologics, and their dosage forms, excipients, and nutritional supplements. It is not surprising that the USP initiative in cell and gene therapy and tissue engineering has closely followed the emergence of these technologies…
The safety of our food supply is a major public health concern for consumers, government regulatory agencies, and the food industry. Earlier generations may recall when fresh produce was largely domestic and seasonal. Today we live in a global marketplace, where fresh fruits and vegetables may be on the vine overseas one day and on our grocer’s shelf the next. Although this has provided more yearround variety of foods for the consumer, a lack of uniformity in established agricultural standards and practices among international trading partners (e.g., sanitary issues and inspections) may ultimately lead to deleterious health effects. This is evident in the number of food-borne illness outbreaks and associated deaths. Negative economic consequences also result through lost wages and productivity, and health care costs. The impact can be far greater in developing nations. Therefore, refining domestic and international food safety policies is at the forefront of many government agencies’ efforts toward protecting the public health. Reducing the number of such incidences has become a priority for government regulatory agencies and the food industry…
On January 31, 2003, FDA under the leadership of Commissioner Dr. Mark McClellan, issued a report entitled “Improving Innovation in Medical Technology: Beyond 2002.” One of the goals described in this report is to “speed potentially important emerging technologies to the market by reducing regulatory uncertainty and increasing the predictability of product development.” The technology areas of cell therapy and gene therapy were specifically identified. This article highlights some of the challenges for manufacturers and regulators of these products and describes ongoing efforts at FDA — as well as opportunities to partner with FDA — to improve the product development process for cell therapy and gene therapy products…
Xenotransplantation has been defined by the US Public Health Service (PHS) as any procedure that involves the transplantation, implantation, or infusion into a human recipient of either (a) live cells, tissues, or organs from a nonhuman animal source, or (b) human body fluids, cells, tissues, or organs that have had ex vivo contact with live, nonhuman animal cells, tissues, or organs (PHS Guideline on Infectious Disease Issues in Xenotransplantation). In the US, several xenotransplantation clinical trials are in progress under US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) oversight. The PHS and the FDA have issued guidelines and guidance documents to address the potential for cross-species infection posed by the use of xenotransplantation products in humans. To minimize the infectious disease risk, these documents provide recommendations on how to screen and maintain source herds, individual source animals, and when possible, xenotransplantation products themselves. However, while precautions can be put in place to remove exogenous infectious agents, the endogenous retroviruses that a source species may carry cannot be removed…
Cellular therapy is currently generating great interest in the treatment of a variety of diseases. In turn, this interest has stimulated the Center of Biologics Evaluation and Research of the Food and Drug Administration to examine its regulatory approach to the products used for these therapies. As a result, facilities preparing cell therapy products are now regarded as manufacturers, and are expected to comply with current Good Manufacturing Practices and/or the proposed current Good Tissue Practices. Compliance with these practices can be a culture shock to some academic centers whose background is firmly in research. The FDA has indicated that there is a sliding scale of compliance depending on the phase of the clinical study. The difficulty for centers is deciding where they fall on the compliance scale, as well as determining what changes must be made to come into compliance. This article reviews some of the factors that must be considered when making these decisions…