The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA) and the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA) are dramatically reshaping business strategies designed to protect intellectual property and regulatory exclusivity rights granted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) and the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) to the sponsors of new and follow-on versions of many biopharmaceutical products. The AIA alters many provisions in the U.S. patent statutes, most notably long-standing policies and practices relating to the conditions for patentability of an invention, particularly 35 USC ยงยง 102 and 103 relating to novelty and non-obviousness, respectively, and introduces new provisions relating to post-grant review proceedings and prioritized examination that will affect the business plans of academic and corporate institutions seeking to discover and develop health care products that serve unmet medical needs or provide consumers with safe sources of drug products at a low cost. The BPCIA implements many new provisions relating to the abbreviated review and approval of follow-on biopharmaceutical products. Important aspects of the BPCIA, particularly issues identified in draft guidance documents that were released by the FDA in February 2012 concerning the characterization, comparison, and evaluation of reference and follow-on macromolecules, will be discussed in this article. Political issues that may jeopardize the BPCIA, economic considerations faced by drug product sponsors, and public reaction to the guidance documents are also discussed in this final article of a three-part series describing key provisions of the AIA and the BPCIA that affect intellectual property and regulatory exclusivity rights of institutions having an interest in developing novel or follow-on versions of biopharmaceutical drug products…
Tag: <span>bpcia</span>
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), which was passed in 2010, included the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA) authorizing the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to establish an abbreviated regulatory approval pathway for complex macromolecules produced in living cells or organisms. The BPCIA implements many new provisions relating to the abbreviated review and approval of follow-on biopharmaceutical products. These include: (1) evaluating the biochemical properties of reference and follow-on macromolecules; (2) establishing procedures for the exchange of information between product sponsors, regulatory agencies, and the federal court system; and (3) establishing periods of regulatory exclusivity which complement patent rights typically awarded to the sponsor of a reference molecule. Important aspects of the BPCIA, particularly issues relating to the exchange of information between product sponsors and the establishment of periods of regulatory exclusivity protecting a novel or follow-on macromolecule are discussed in this article. This is the second in a series of three articles describing key provisions of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA) and the BPCIA that affect intellectual property rights of academic and corporate institutions having an interest in the life sciences…
Government policies affecting intellectual property rights and the review of food and health care products dramatically influence investments in research leading to the development and sale of products that serve unmet medical needs or provide consumers with safe sources of food and drug products at a low cost. When statutes that affect several regulatory agencies are revised within a short time period, institutions that rely on exclusive rights offered by those agencies in exchange for obligations of disclosure and compliance must alter their business plans to adjust to new rules leading to the benefit conferred by the government. In 2011, the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA) was passed, changing many aspects of the federal statutes relating to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO), and in 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) was passed, which included the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA), requiring the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to establish an abbreviated regulatory approval pathway for complex macromolecules produced in living cells or organisms. This series of articles briefly reviews key aspects of the AIA and the BPCIA, plus recent court cases relating to complementary periods of exclusivity offered by the FDA and the PTO, which should be of great interest to academic and corporate institutions having an interest in the life sciences. Important aspects of the AIA will be discussed in the first article in this series…
